论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法第267条第2款规定:“携带凶器抢夺的,依照本法第263条的规定定罪处罚。”但由于该法条对罪状的叙述过于简单,给人们理解的外延就更加宽泛。2005年6月8日,最高人民法院发布了《关于审理抢劫、抢夺刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》(以下简称《意见》),其中第4条就“携带凶器抢夺”的认定问题进行了进一步的说明:一种是
Article 267, paragraph 2, of our Criminal Law stipulates that: “Whoever seizes a weapon for another purpose shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of Article 263 of this Law.” However, as the law makes the statement of guilt too simple, it is even more broad-based . On June 8, 2005, the Supreme People’s Court issued Opinions on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Robbery and Robbing of Criminal Cases (hereinafter referred to as “Opinions”), of which Article 4, on the identification of “robbery” A further explanation: one is