论文部分内容阅读
本文重视口传史料,从文献记载、出土文物、民间口碑等三方面综合、系统、全息地思考,互相印证,从而证明白驹施耐庵的历史真实,在破译施耐庵之谜的道路上又向前推进了一步。同时,本文对当前施耐庵研究领域出现的所谓“盐城兴化”施耐庵(彦端)、大丰修建施耐庵陵园的不实之词进行了批评,指出否认白驹施耐庵的人未能深入调查、方法片面,以致闹出不应有的谬误。
This paper pays attention to the historical materials of oral tradition, and makes comprehensive, systematic and holographic reflection on the literature from three aspects: documentary records, unearthed cultural relics and folk word of mouth, so as to prove the historical truth of Baiju Shinai. On the way of deciphering the mystery of Shi Naian Take a step forward. At the same time, this article criticizes the so-called “Yancheng Xinghua” Shi Naian (Yan Duan) and the Dafeng Building Shi Naian Cemetery, which appear in the field of Shi Naian research, and denied that Bai Ju Shi Nai Nunnery people failed to conduct in-depth investigations and methods in a one-sided manner, so that unexpected fallacies should be raised.