“吉迪恩案”中 ,联邦最高法院赋予了“穷人有获取刑事法律援助的宪法权利” ;“尼诺案”中 ,最高法院又确立了“公民享有要求政府采取公共行动的宪法权利 ,不论这一权利的行使是否有违法之目的 ,也不论其行为是单一行动还是一致行动 ,都不受反垄断法的管辖。”律师联盟案中 ,这两种宪法权利发生了冲突 ,最高法院最终选择了优先保护社会弱者的权利。 In the case of “the Gideon case,” the Supreme Court granted the “constitutional rights of the poor to criminal legal aid.” In the Nino case, the Supreme Court also established that “citizens enjoy the constitutional right to require the government to take public action, Whether the exercise of this right has the purpose of breaking the law or whether the act is a single act or a concerted act is not governed by the antitrust law. ”In the lawyers union case, the two constitutional rights clashed and the Supreme Court ultimately chose The priority is to protect the rights of the weak in society.