一、问题的引出 2002年4月11日,黑龙江省牡丹江铁路运输法院开庭审理被告人孟广虎故意伤害一案,此前控辩双方达成了“辩诉交易”的合意,并经过了会议庭的严格程序性审查,所以本次开庭仅历时25分钟。被害人和被告人均对此表示满意。 这就是“中国辩诉交易第一案”。 此案审理一结束,即引起国内学术界和实务界的广泛争论。通过对国外辩诉交易程序的研究,同时结合对中国国情的思考,笔者认为,在中国现 First, the problem leads April 11, 2002, Heilongjiang Mudanjiang Railway Transport Court hearing the defendant Meng Guanghu deliberately hurt the case, after the prosecution and the defense reached a “plea bargaining” agreement, and after a meeting of the court strictly procedural Review, so the trial only lasted 25 minutes. Both the victim and the accused are satisfied with this. This is the first case of plea bargain in China. As soon as the trial of the case ended, it aroused widespread controversy in academia and practice in China. Through the study of the foreign plea bargaining procedure, combined with the thinking of China’s national conditions, the author believes that in China