《首都医药》杂志第6卷第3期22页“维生素B_6鉴别试验的研究”一文的作者提出:“中国药典九五版二部维生素B_6片剂和针剂的鉴别,参照维生素B_6项下的鉴别(1)项试验,应显相同的反应,但经过反复严格的实验也是不呈正反应”,该文作者通过多次试验,找出了两条鉴别维生素B_6的新方法。本人认为,做不出正反应,问题出在试剂上。 本文第一次做含维生素B_6的中成药——“参维灵片”的维生素B_6鉴别时,同样做不出正反应。因为是第一次做维生素B_6鉴别,首先怀疑自己没有掌握好该鉴别的操作,重做后,结果仍是不呈正反应,于是怀疑试剂 “Capital Medical” magazine Volume 6 No. 3 22, “Vitamin B_6 Identification Test” a paper author: “Chinese Pharmacopoeia 95 edition two vitamin B_6 tablets and injections, with reference to the identification of vitamin B_6 (1) test should be the same response, but after repeated rigorous experiments is not positive reaction, ”the author of the author through several tests, to identify two new methods to identify vitamin B_6. I think, can not make a positive reaction, the problem lies in the reagent. This article for the first time made with vitamin B_6 proprietary Chinese medicine - “ginseng tablets” vitamin B_6 identification, the same can not make a positive reaction. Because it is the first time to do vitamin B_6 identification, first of all doubt they did not grasp the identification of the operation, after redo, the result is still not a positive reaction, so suspect reagent