论文部分内容阅读
为了促进语文教改,提高语文教学水平,去年十一月,我县举行了初中语文观摩教学评比,由较而片而县地层层选拔。我有幸参加了县里的评议,得以欣尝许多位教师的教学艺术,感触颇多。这里只略记一二。一初一教《谈骨气》,在搞清议论文三要素的基础上,教师引导学生找出了课文的论点、解释论点的语句和论据,随即出现如下板书:论点 解释论点 论据 富贵不能淫 文天祥不受利诱为 国捐躯中国人民 骨气是 贫贱不能移是有骨气 齐国穷人不吃嗟来的 之食 威武不能屈 闻一多拍案而起接着教师提出:这三个论据能否调换位置?学生异口同声地回答“不能”。为什么不能呢?却众说纷纭
In order to promote language teaching reform and improve the level of language teaching, in November last year, the county held a junior high school language observation teaching appraisal, which was selected by the film and county level. I had the privilege of participating in the county’s appraisal, and I was delighted with the teaching art of many teachers. Only one or two notes here. Upon teaching “Talking about Bone Gas” in the first grade, the teacher guided the students to find out the arguments of the text and the sentences and arguments for interpreting the argument based on the three elements of the dissertation. Then the following board appeared: Argument Explanation Thesis arguments The rich can not be profanity Tianxiang Not benefiting from temptation to give the country to die for the Chinese people is the backbone of the Chinese people. It is impoverished and impassable. The people of the country do not eat the food. The mighty can’t be swept by a racket. Then the teacher proposes: Can these three arguments change the position? Answer “can’t”. Why can’t we?