论文部分内容阅读
社会科学成果评价的发展,经历了一个从同行学者的单一定性评议,到使用评价指标将定性评价与定量评价相结合,从较为单一的同行评价方式,到同行评议与文献计量分析多种评价方法互相补充的演变过程。成果评价中的直接指标和间接指标、直接评价与间接评价、主观评价和客观评价的相互关系和存在的问题,所反映的正是社会科学研究成果评价的悖论。
The development of evaluation of social science achievements has experienced a single qualitative evaluation from peer scholars to the use of evaluation indicators to combine qualitative and quantitative evaluation, from a single peer evaluation method to peer evaluation and bibliometric analysis of a variety of evaluation Methods complement each other’s evolution. The direct and indirect indicators in the evaluation of results, the interrelations and existent problems between direct evaluation and indirect evaluation, subjective evaluation and objective evaluation reflect the paradox of social science research achievement evaluation.