论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨间歇蓝光照射和持续蓝光照射治疗新生儿黄疸的不同临床疗效。方法本研究选取2009年7月至2012年12月我院收治的新生儿黄疸共108例,随机平均分为间歇蓝光照射组54例和持续蓝光照射组54例,比较两组患儿的不同临床疗效和安全性。结果随访后统计学结果显示,持续蓝光照射组的总有效率为88.89%,间歇蓝光照射组总有效率为90.74%,两组总有效率经统计学比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而间歇蓝光照射组的不良反应发生率明显少于持续蓝光照射组,具有显著性(P<0.05)。结论持续蓝光照射和间歇蓝光照射治疗对新生儿黄疸的临床治疗效果基本相同,但间歇蓝光照射对新生儿的不良反应低于持续蓝光照射,安全可靠,具有更大的临床推广价值。
Objective To investigate the different clinical effects of intermittent blue light irradiation and continuous blue light irradiation on neonatal jaundice. Methods In this study, 108 cases of neonatal jaundice admitted to our hospital from July 2009 to December 2012 were randomly divided into intermittent blue light irradiation group (54 cases) and continuous blue light irradiation group (54 cases) Efficacy and safety. Results The follow-up results showed that the total effective rate of continuous blue light irradiation group was 88.89% and that of intermittent blue light irradiation group was 90.74%. There was no significant difference between the two groups in total effective rate (P> 0.05 ). The incidence of adverse reactions in intermittent blue light irradiation group was significantly less than that in continuous blue light irradiation group (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous blue light irradiation and intermittent blue light irradiation have the same clinical effect on neonatal jaundice. However, the adverse reactions of intermittent blue light irradiation to neonates are lower than that of continuous blue light irradiation, which is safe and reliable and has greater clinical promotion value.