论文部分内容阅读
2012年《刑事诉讼法》规定的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡案件违法所得没收程序对于解决我国实践中存在的问题具有重要意义,但也存在一些需要进一步探讨的问题。在适用范围方面,立法从案件性质与逃匿时间两方面加以限制,实无必要性。在案件证明方面,应当在检察机关与利害关系人之间合理分配举证责任,明确相应的证明标准。为保证没收裁判具有可执行性,应当借鉴美国联邦民事没收程序,建立体系性的财产保全措施。另外,应当增加涉案财物查封、扣押地法院作为没收程序的管辖法院。
The procedure of forfeiture of illegal proceeds of criminal suspects and defendants in the 2012 Criminal Procedure Law stipulated by the Criminal Procedure Law is of great significance for solving the problems existing in our country’s practice, but there are also some issues that need to be further explored. In terms of the scope of application, it is not necessary for legislation to limit the nature of the case and the time to escape from the crime. Proof of the case, the procuratorial organs and stakeholders should be reasonable distribution of the burden of proof, a clear proof of the corresponding standards. In order to ensure the enforceability of the forfeiture referee, we should learn from the federal federal civil forfeiture procedure and establish a systematic property preservation measure. In addition, the seizure of the involved property and the seizure of the court should be added as the competent courts for confiscation.