论文部分内容阅读
一、前言关于日本担保权实行方法的成文法,有以旧拍卖法(1898年)为前身的民事执行法(1979年),作为国家执行机关的执行裁判所掌管着基于该法律的拍卖等执行程序。但是,并不是所有担保权的实行都必须依赖执行程序。抵押权等典型担保,主要预先规定了依赖执行机关实现担保权的实行程序,但是这也不能称之为强行法。而且,让与担保等非典型担保,没有预先规定依赖执行程序。在这种不依赖执行程序的担保权实行(称为“私人实施”)
I. INTRODUCTION The written law on the method of implementing a security right in Japan includes the Civil Enforcement Law (1979), which is the predecessor of the Old Auction Law (1898) (1979) and the executive enforcement of the auction based on the law as the executive tribunal of the national executive body. However, not all enforcement of security rights must depend on the enforcement process. Typical guarantees such as mortgages mainly pre-set procedures for relying on implementing agencies to realize security rights, but this can not be called jus cogens. Moreover, atypical guarantees such as warranties and guarantees do not provide for a priori reliance on enforcement procedures. In such a non-implementation-dependent security right (known as “private enforcement”)