论文部分内容阅读
目的:对药物流产和负压吸宫术流产的临床治疗效果进行研究分析。方法:从2009年~2011年我院接收的人工流产妇女中选出80例,随机进行分组,对照组和研究组各40例。对照组采用药物终止妊娠,研究组采用负压吸宫术终止妊娠。结果:治疗后,对照组的完全流产率为85.0%,研究组的完全流产率为97.5%,2组完全流产率比较具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。同时对照组早孕患者的出血时间明显比研究组长,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组与研究组患者的不满意率分别为17.5%、10.0%,差异不具有显著性(P>0.05)。结论:临床中用于药物流产和负压吸宫流产的终止妊娠方式具有其优缺点,因此临床中应用都比较多。
Objective: To study the clinical effect of abortion and vacuum abortion. Methods: From 2009 to 2011, 80 cases of induced abortion women in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into control group and study group, 40 cases in each group. The control group used drugs to terminate the pregnancy, and the study group used negative pressure suction to terminate the pregnancy. Results: After treatment, the complete abortion rate was 85.0% in the control group and 97.5% in the study group. There was a significant difference (P <0.05) in the complete abortion rate between the two groups. At the same time, the bleeding time of the control group was significantly higher than that of the study group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The dissatisfaction rates between the control group and the study group were 17.5% and 10.0% respectively, with no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The termination of pregnancy for medical abortion and vacuum abortion has its advantages and disadvantages, so the clinical application are more.