该不该写这篇小文,考虑了将近一年。 去年我任教高三,指导学生用“三M法” 写应试议论文,学生的优秀考场作文大批涌 现,学生们的信心也越来越足,简直无论什 么作文题,都成了小菜一碟。后经我推荐出 去的学生考场作文,十篇之中有八篇获得公 开发表。 但这“三M法”有公式化之嫌,绝不符合 正统的作文教学理论,我自己也并不认为其 科学,觉得拿出去可能会贻笑大方,乃至成 It’s not time to write this small article and consider it for nearly a year. Last year, I taught high school and instructed students to write test papers in accordance with the “Three M Laws”. Students’ excellent composition in the examination room emerged in large numbers. The confidence of students became more and more sufficient. Whatever essay questions, they became a piece of cake. . After the students’ essay was recommended by me, eight out of ten textbooks received a public development form. However, this “three M method” has the suspicion of formulating and is in no way consistent with the orthodox composition teaching theory. I don’t think of myself as science either, I think it might be laughable, even if it’s taken out.