论文部分内容阅读
现在的耗材市场,鱼龙混杂,大量劣质灌装、兼容墨水充斥其间。许多似是而非的观念影响着大家对耗材的正确认知。“灌装墨水更利于环保”便是一例。有些灌装厂商宣称硒鼓或墨盒中含有对环境有害的成份,灌装是对资源的循环利用,有利于保护环境。到底是原装墨还是灌装墨更利于环保?如果把墨水从设计生产、安装使用到回收利用等方面进行比较,不难发现上述观点是何等地牵强附会。在设计生产阶段,以 HP DesignJet 5000系列大幅面打印机墨水为例,惠普很早就注意到化学成分对环境的影响,并反复改良墨水的配方,通过了德国“Blue Angel”环保认
The current supplies market, quite a mixed bag, a large number of poor-quality filling, compatible ink flooded the meantime. Many specious ideas affect the correct understanding of supplies. “Filling ink more environmentally friendly ” is an example. Some filling manufacturers claim cartridges or cartridges contain environmentally harmful ingredients, filling is the recycling of resources, is conducive to the protection of the environment. In the end is the original ink or filling ink is more conducive to environmental protection? If the ink from the design and production, installation and use to recycling and other aspects of comparison, not difficult to find such a viewpoint far fetched. In the design and production stage, HP DesignJet 5000 series of large format printer ink, for example, HP has long been aware of the chemical composition of the impact on the environment, and repeatedly improve the ink formula, adopted the German “Blue Angel ” environmental recognition