论文部分内容阅读
中共对冯玉祥评价很高,但那是后来的事,他们对冯的第一印象其实并不好。在中共看来,冯尽管把溥仪赶出了皇宫,也脱不了军阀底色。陈独秀就断定:“此次北京政变,显然是英美帝国主义者抛弃了一个旧工具吴佩孚,换上了一个新工具冯玉祥。”时任北京区委书记的赵世炎也认为“冯玉祥不配称革命”。但主持北方区委工作的李大钊看好冯玉祥,
The Chinese Communist Party appraised Feng Yuxiang very high, but that was something that followed. Their first impression of Feng was not that good. In the opinion of the CCP, Feng, although Pu Yi was driven out of the palace, can not take off the background of the warlords. Chen Duxiu concluded: “The Beijing coup was apparently the Anglo-American imperialists who had abandoned Wu Peifu, an old tool, and replaced Feng Yuxiang with a new tool.” Zhao Shiyan, then-Beijing party secretary, also believed that “Feng Yuxiang deserved to be called a revolution ”. However, Li Dazhao who presided over the work of the Northern District prefers Feng Yuxiang,