论文部分内容阅读
在国际建坛上,人们普遍关注和谈论的热点之一,是与构成主义(Construction)一词相对的“解构主义(Deconstruction)。“解构主义”不是一种风格而是一种意识形态。“解构主义”思潮是跨哲学所引起的。1988年3月和6月分别在伦敦和纽约举办了首届解构主义国际学术研讨会和解构主义七人展(盖里,库哈斯、哈迪特,李伯斯金,希麦勃劳,屈米和埃森曼)。在解构主义为主流的建筑思潮中,同时出现另一个新的名词“重构主义”(Reconstruction).本文所载即是这两个流派中有代表性的人物彼德·埃森曼(Peter Eisenman)和里昂·克利尔(Leon Krier)之间的辩论,实际上代表了解构主义与重构主义之间的争论.
One of the hot spots that people are generally concerned about and talk about on the international construction altar is “Deconstruction” that is the opposite of constructive construction. “Deconstructionism” is not a style but an ideology. The “deconstructivism” ideological trend was caused by cross-philosophy. In March and June 1988, the first deconstruction international academic symposium and deconstruction seven-person exhibition were held in London and New York (Gary, Koolhaas, Hardett, Libeskind, Jimmie Blau, Kymi and Eisenman) In the architectural trend of deconstruction as the mainstream, there is another new term “Reconstruction”. This article contains this The debate between Peter Eisenman and Leon Krier, representative figures in the two schools, actually represented the debate between deconstructionism and reconstructionism.