熟悉我国诽谤法的人都知道,在我国,新闻媒体引发的商业诽谤案已逐渐成为一种重要的媒体侵权纠纷类型。但在过往,当新闻媒体作为名誉侵权案的被告时,法院通常是在审理结束后才作做出停止侵害的判决。而始于2013年、终于2015年的360公司(1)诉“每经”(2)商业诽谤案中出现了新动向:这场长达两年多的角力以“每经”被判败诉、承担高额损害赔偿金而告终,同时在我国当代司法实践中第一次在案件审理之前就发布了涉案媒体不得继续进行同题报道的法院禁令,这不啻是开始确立一种新的商业诽谤法规则,值得法律界和 People familiar with our country’s defamation laws know that in our country, commercial defamation cases triggered by the news media have gradually become an important type of media infringement disputes. However, in the past, when the news media was the defendant in a reputation infringement case, the court usually decided to stop the infringement after the hearing was over. And starting in 2013, 360 companies (1) v. “Every” (2) commercial defamation case that ended up in 2015 showed a new trend: this more than two years of wrestling to “every” Was adjudged to be defeated and pleaded guilty to a large amount of damages. At the same time, it was the first time in our country’s contemporary judicial practice that a court ban on media coverage of the same issue was released before the trial of the case. This is not the beginning of establishing a new The Business Defamation Law is worth the legal community