论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析微创经皮肾镜和大通道经皮肾镜治疗肾结石的临床效果。方法选取2014年11月-2015年11月收治的肾结石患者60例,采取随机抽签方法将其分成两组,各30例。对研究组患者应用微创经皮肾镜方法,对参照组患者应用大通道经皮肾镜方法,对比分析两组患者的临床治疗指标。结果两组患者手术时间、清石率等指标数据差异不显著(P>0.05),两组患者的术中出血量指标数据差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论将微创经皮肾镜方法应用于肾结石的治疗中,在保证临床治疗过程中减少出血量,保证手术安全有效,具有较大临床推广应用价值。
Objective To comparatively analyze the clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal calculi. Methods Sixty patients with nephrolithiasis were selected from Nov. 2014 to Nov. 2015. The patients were divided into two groups (n = 30) by random sampling. The study group patients with minimally invasive percutaneous nephroscopy method, the reference group of patients with large-channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy method, comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical treatment. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation time and the rate of clear stone (P> 0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups in the data of intraoperative blood loss (P <0.05). Conclusion The minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of kidney stones, to ensure that the amount of bleeding during clinical treatment to ensure safe and effective operation, with greater clinical application value.