自先秦以来,学者对于为己与为人之学的关系辨析就从未停止。《礼记·大学》在开篇就提到:正心、诚意、致知、格物、修身、齐家、治国、平天下。从中不难看出,古往今来的先贤们将强调自身品德修养的“为己”之学置于怎样的地位,在宋代,“为己”之学尤其受到重视,当然,这也是宋代儒学的内倾体现。笔者赞同朱熹严格区分为己之学与为人之学的态度,也认为在当今社会,对这一问题的探讨是十分必要的,而坚守“为己之学”的古训更有着无法取代的现实意义。 Since the pre-Qin period, scholars have never stopped analyzing the relationship between self-serving and self-serving. “Book of Rites University” mentioned in the opening: Zhengxin, sincerity, to know, things, self-cultivation, Qi, governing the country, the world. It is not hard to see that the ancestors of the past and present will emphasize their own “morality” of “morality”. In the Song Dynasty, “oneself” was especially valued, of course, The introvert manifestation. The author agrees that Zhu Xi’s attitude of strictly distinguishing himself from his own learning and his own learning also holds that in today’s society the exploration of this issue is very necessary and the ancient one that sticks to the theory of “one’s own self” is more irreplaceable Realistic meaning.