笔者7月19日给许驭信中写道:“你经过20多年艰辛研究提出的宇宙线渺子引发天然冷核变(包括硅核冷裂变与氧核冷裂变)学说及诸多宏大的创新思想,所经历的艰辛路径基本上是我国科技创新的东方思维模式路径。”本人做这样的判断是否正确?带着这个问题去寻找印证。原来早在9年前在《环球》杂志和新浪网上,几位院士就东方思维能否拯救中国科技展开了激烈辩论。引起这场辩论的由头之一是,在姜岩的博士论文基 On July 19, the author wrote to Xu Yu Xin: “After more than two decades of arduous studies, you have initiated the theory of natural cold nuclear changes (including cold nuclear fission and cold nuclear fission) and many grand innovations Thinking, the difficult path experienced is basically the path of oriental thinking mode of our country’s scientific and technological innovation. ”“ I myself made such a judgment is correct? With this question to find evidence. As early as nine years ago in the ”Global" magazine and Sina.com, several academicians on East thinking can save the Chinese science and technology launched a fierce debate. One of the first causes of this debate is the doctoral dissertation foundation in Jiang Yan