论文部分内容阅读
本文通过比较目前国内比较权威、影响面比较广的四种学术期刊评价体系对法学期刊的评价结果,分析其中的差异,进而对这四种学术评价体系的评价目的、定义、研究方法、学科范围进行比较,分析这四种学术期刊评价体系在此基础上构建的评价指标,并指出法学期刊现有评价指标体系的不足,进而提出法学学术期刊评价指标体系构建的设想,以期获得业界认同,并对其他学科的学术期刊评价指标体系提供参考。
This article compares the evaluation results of legal journals of four academic journals with comparatively comparatively influential domestic ones and analyzes the differences among them. And then, the purpose, definition, research methods, scopes of the four academic evaluation systems Then it analyzes the evaluation index of these four academic journals evaluation system based on this foundation and points out the shortages of the current evaluation index system of journals, then puts forward the idea of establishing the evaluation index system of juristic academic journals in order to obtain the approval of the industry and It provides reference to the evaluation index system of academic journals in other disciplines.