论文部分内容阅读
一位专家说。1998年的大水和2000年的沙尘暴.林业系统两次背了“黑锅”:发大水的时候,人们批评林业系统砍树那么多,全不管是陡坡耕地带来了百分之七八十的泥沙。以致小水成了大灾;沙尘漫卷的时候。人们又批评林业系统种树那么少。也不问漫漫黄沙更多地来自过度放牧和弃耕农田,以致治理抵不过破坏。 历史和时代最络选择了林业来回应这两次中华民族的生态灾难:天保工程和京津风沙源治理工程上马。从某种程度上也可以
An expert said. The floods in 1998 and the sandstorms in 2000. The forestry system has twice carried the “black pot”: When the flood was started, people criticized the forestry system for cutting trees so much, no matter whether the steep slope cultivated land brought about 70% Sediment. So little water has become a catastrophe; People have also criticized the forestry system for planting so few trees. Nor do we ask that long-running sand come more from overgrazing and abandonment of farmland, so that treatment can not be destroyed. History and the times most choose the forestry to respond to the two ecological disaster of the Chinese nation: Natural Forest Protection Project and Beijing and Tianjin sand source management project launched. To some extent, it is okay