最高人民法院奇虎公司与腾讯公司垄断纠纷一案判决专业性的一个显著体现是,借鉴了国际上有影响力的判决和理论。在判定腾讯市场支配地位的分析过程中,除了市场份额之外,最高院回归市场支配地位的本质,考察了腾讯是否拥有提高价格、降低质量、阻碍市场进入、延迟创新的能力。这和理论界一直以来对市场份额作为反映企业市场支配能力的唯一标准的质疑相吻合。在快速多变的互联网产业中, One of the notable manifestations of the professional judgment of Supreme People’s Court Qihoo Company and Tencent Monopoly Disputes is drawing on internationally influential judgments and theories. In determining Tencent’s market dominance analysis process, in addition to market share, the Supreme Court returned to the dominant position in the market to examine whether Tencent has the ability to increase prices, reduce quality, hinder market entry and delay innovation. This is consistent with the question of market share as the sole criterion for the market power of enterprises in theory. In the rapidly changing Internet industry,