我与《粤海风》的关系比较简明。先是多年以前听到前辈学者称赞广州的刊物,其中便有《粤海风》。不过前辈又补充了一句:它们的作者主要是北京的。此后便是给《粤海风》投稿了。《粤海风》共用过我三篇稿子,一篇是我在中山大学组织的“青年学者沙龙”的对话记录,一篇谈单位制度下文人生存方式,另一篇则是重议舒芜“交信事件”的稿子。每次“程序”都似乎是先发去电子文稿,隔上不久便收到刊有稿子的刊物。没有例行的客套。这给我极干净的印象。所以值 My relationship with “Guangdong Sea Wind” is relatively concise. First, many years ago I heard some of my predecessors praised the publication of Guangzhou, among which there was “Guangdong Sea Style Wind.” However, the predecessors added one sentence: their author is mainly Beijing. Since then is to “Guangdong sea wind” submitted. “Yuehai Breeze” shared with me three manuscripts, one is the dialogue record of “Young Scholar” organized by Sun Yat-sen University, one on the survival style of the literati under the unit system, and the other is the review of Shu Wu “letter of credit incident ” manuscript. Every time the “program” seems to be sent to electronic manuscripts shortly afterwards, he has received the manuscripts published. No routine polite. This gives me a very clean impression. So value