论文部分内容阅读
目的:汉化修订加拿大护理信息能力评估量表并进行信效度检验。方法:严格按照Brislin翻译模型进行正译与回译，并组织7名专家对量表进行调适。采用便利抽样法，于2019年8—12月，使用汉化、调适后的护理信息实践能力评估量表对青岛市某三级甲等综合医院的923名临床护理人员进行调查，以检验量表的信效度。结果:最终形成的护理信息实践能力评估量表的内容效度指数为0.960。探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子，累计方差贡献率为70.455%；验证性因子分析结果显示，量表的卡方自由度比为2.862，近似误差均方根为0.047，拟合优度指数为0.893，比较拟合指数为0.947，递增拟合指数为0.948，规范拟合指数为0.922，相对拟合指数为0.906，Tucker-Lewis指数为0.937。量表总的Cronbach's α系数为0.950，折半信度为0.863，重测信度为0.827。结论:护理信息实践能力评估量表具有良好的信效度，可以作为临床护士护理信息能力的评价工具。“,”Objective:To translate the Canadian Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale into Chinese, revise it and test its reliability and validity.Methods:Translation and back translation were conducted strictly following the Brislin translation model, and 7 experts were organized to adjust the scale. From August to December 2019, convenience sampling was used to select 923 nurses in a ClassⅢ Grade A hospital in Qingdao for investigation with the Chinese version of the adjusted Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale so as to test its reliability and validity.Results:The content validity index of the final Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale was 0.960. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 70.455%. The confirmatory factor analysis result showed that χ n 2/n df was 2.862, and root mean square error approximation was 0.047, and goodness of fit index was 0.893, and comparative fit index was 0.947, and incremental fit index was 0.948, and normative fit index was 0.922, and relative fit index was 0.906, and Tucker-Lewis index was 0.937. The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.950, and the half-fold reliability was 0.863, and the test-retest reliability was 0.827.n Conclusions:The Nurse Informatics Competency Assessment Scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an evaluation tool for clinical nurses' nursing information competency.