论文部分内容阅读
由梁启超所开创的新史学一般被学界定位于20世纪初至“五四”以前,而事实上,“五四”以后新史学不仅并未消沉,而且作为重要的史学流派发展壮大,诸多学者以此为旗帜而不断探索。卫聚贤即是其一。卫氏治学,不仅以鲜明的进化史观为理论指导,而且具有突出的国民意识,主张史学致用;同时大力倡导借鉴统计学、考古学、人类学、社会学以及民俗学等多学科方法,关注史学史这一新领域并重视系统性“著史”的撰述方式。此外,他尝试运用唯物史观观察和分析历史问题,从而使其研究呈现出新鲜气象;而这种学术转向是新史学传承者较为普遍的现象,充分折射出新史学与马克思主义史学在学理上所存在着的共通性。
The new historiography started by Liang Qichao was generally positioned by scholars until before the May Fourth Movement in the early 20th century. In fact, the new historiography not only did not degenerate but also became an important historical school after the May 4th Movement Many scholars use this as a banner to continuously explore. Wei Ju-hyun is one of them. Wei’s scholarship, not only with a clear historical view of evolution as the theoretical guidance, but also has outstanding national awareness, advocating the use of history; at the same time vigorously advocate the use of statistics, archeology, anthropology, sociology and folklore and other multi-disciplinary methods, Paying attention to the new field of history and emphasizing the systematic way of writing history. In addition, he tries to use historical materialism to observe and analyze historical issues, so that his research shows a fresh atmosphere. This academic turn is a more common phenomenon among the neo-historians and reflects the theory of neo-historiography and Marxism historically There is a commonality.