论文部分内容阅读
国家统计局在《城市高收入群体分析》中,用“高收入群体”代替了“富人”之说。其出台的中国“富人”新标准为:年收入3.2万元。这是全国城市住户 10％最高收人家庭户均可支配收入的底线。这太令人兴奋了,“哈哈,我也成了富人2”可是兴奋之余,不免有些疑虑和辛酸。我都快成京城乞丐了,居然还有人说我是富人！按照这个标准,京城恐怕满街都是富人。 当然,这是绝对标准,是站在全国范围内看,个别地区还有相对标准,譬如在西部,年薪5万是很了不起的了,在北京却很一般。中国的富人到了国外,还抵不上一个洗盘子的女工。统计局说,根据地区差异,北京的相对富人标准是年收入6万元。即便如此,也不能说明问题。按照这个标准,这些
National Bureau of Statistics in the “analysis of urban high-income groups”, with “high-income groups” instead of “rich”. The introduction of China’s “rich” new standard: annual income of 32,000 yuan. This is the bottom line for per capita disposable income of the top 10% of urban households in the country. This is very exciting, “haha, I have become the rich 2” But excitement aside, some doubts and bitterness inevitably. I almost became a beggar in the capital, actually there are people that I am rich! According to this standard, I am afraid the capital is full of rich streets. Of course, this is an absolute standard. It stands at a national level and there are relative standards in some areas. For example, in the west, the annual salary of 50,000 is remarkable. It is quite common in Beijing. The rich in China have gone abroad and can not afford a female worker to wash their dishes. According to the Bureau of Statistics, according to the regional differences, Beijing’s relative rich standard is an annual income of 60,000 yuan. Even so, it does not explain the problem. According to this standard, these