论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨针对小儿支气管哮喘患者,观察选择不同雾化吸入方法完成治疗后获得的临床效果.方法:选择我院2013年02月-2015年02月小儿支气管哮喘患者130例.通过随机数表法对支气管哮喘患儿进行随机分组.D2组(对照组65例):选择常规雾化吸入方法;D1组(观察组65例):选择氧驱动雾化吸入的方法.针对所有患者实施针对性护理.对比最终获得的临床效果.结果:在临床治疗总有效率以及临床禾良反应发生率方面,D1组明显优于D2组支气管哮喘患儿(P〈0.05).结论:针对小儿支气管哮喘患者,临床选择氧驱动雾化给药配合针对性护理的方法进行干预,最终获得效果较优,值得临床广泛应用. “,”objective: to study on pediatric patients with bronchial asthma, observation to select different atomizing inhalation after completing treatment methods for clinical effect.Methods: our hospital 02, 2013-02, 2015, 130 cases of infantile bronchial asthma patients. Through the stochastic indicator method for random grouping children with bronchial asthma. D2 group (the control group, 65 cases) : choose conventional atomization inhalation method; D1 (observation group 65 cases) : choose the method of oxygen atomizing inhalation. The implementation of targeted nursing for all patients. Contrast for clinical effect.Results:the total effective rate in the clinical treatment and the clinical incidence of adverse reactions, D1, D2 is obviously better than the group of children with bronchial asthma (P 〈 0.05).Conclusion: in infantile bronchial asthma patients, clinical choice of oxygen aerosol dosing with targeted nursing intervention methods, eventually get effect is better, is worth wide application in the clinical practice.