论文部分内容阅读
小案例大问题 2000年12月11日下午,北京市第二中级人民法院第十三法庭。审判长正在宣读二审判决书:“本庭就北京市二轻工业总公司下属北京装潢研究所职工张云玲诉北京市社保中心关于应予办理补缴其1994年至1996年养老保险费,不服东城区法院一审判决案,诉至本庭,现在本庭进行宣判。”整个法庭只回荡着审判长宣读判决书的声音,原告张云
Small case big problem In the afternoon of December 11, 2000, the Second Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing City, the thirteenth court. Presiding judge is reading the verdict of second instance: “Our court Zhang Yunling, employee of Beijing Decoration Research Institute affiliated to Erlian Industrial Corporation of Beijing, v. Beijing Municipal Social Security Center about refusing to pay for its pension insurance fee from 1994 to 1996, disagreeing with Dongcheng District Court of First Instance Verdict, to court, now the court verdict. ”The court only echoes the judge read the verdict, the plaintiff Zhang Yun