论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较牙髓摘除术和牙髓切断术加失活法在牙髓炎病例应急处理的治疗效果。方法 2 2 6例牙髓炎 ,10 3例采用牙髓摘除术 ,12 3例采用牙髓切断术加失活法 ,比较两组的疼痛缓解率和疼痛加重发生率 ,并且通过统计完成牙髓治疗的总次数 ,对两组内和两组间年龄病例和年长病例作出对比。结果 两组的疼痛缓解率和疼痛加重发生率无显著差异 (P >0 0 5 ) ,但是 ,在牙髓摘除术中 ,年轻病例完成牙髓治疗总次数明显低于年长病例 (P<0 0 1)。结论 在牙髓应急处理中 ,两种方法均可采用 ;对于年轻患者 ,采用牙髓摘除术中可能获得较大效益
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of endodontic and endodontic plus deactivation in emergency treatment of pulpitis. Methods 226 cases of pulpitis, 103 cases of dental pulp removal, 123 cases of endodontic deactivation method, the pain relief rate and pain were compared between the two groups, and statistics by the completion of the dental pulp The total number of treatments was compared between age and older patients in the two groups and between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the rates of pain relief and pain aggravation between the two groups (P> 0.05). However, the total number of dental pulp treatment completed in younger patients during endodontic surgery was significantly lower than that in older patients (P <0. 05) 0 1). Conclusion In the emergency treatment of pulp, both methods can be used; for young patients, the use of dental pulp removal may gain greater benefits