论文部分内容阅读
1 二、三年前,一位据说是什么什么研究学会的学者,到我所在的学院来讲学。他由八卦图与心理气质的对应、道袍上阴阳符号与电子计算机二进制的关系,直说到螺旋思维、弯曲空间、大数定律……一群听众虽半迷半悟,却也不住点头。末了的结论似乎是说马克思的文艺观乃是本体论的文艺观! 很惭愧,我对本体论所知甚少。只知它极玄奥,是与认识论不大一样的一种研究世界本原、本性的存在学说。在康德的哲学里,上述区别被表述为“现象”与“本体”两个概念。这位哲人认为,只有前者(现象)才是认识对象,而后者(本体)则不可知。即:本体虽是一种存在,却不是人的认识对象,而
Two or three years ago, a scholar of what is said to be a research society, to my college to lecture. He by the gossip map and the corresponding psychological temperament, robe yin and yang symbols and electronic computer binary relationship, straight to the spiral thinking, bending space, law of large numbers ... ... a group of listeners although half-fan half-hearted, but did not nodded. The final conclusion seems to be that Marx’s literary view is an ontological view of literature and art! I am ashamed, and I know very little about ontology. Only know it is extremely mysterious, is not the same with epistemology of a study of the world’s original, nature existence theory. In Kant’s philosophy, the above differences are expressed as concepts of “phenomenon” and “noumenon.” The philosopher believes that only the former (phenomenon) is the object of knowing, while the latter (ontology) is unknown. Namely: Although the body is a kind of existence, it is not the object of human cognition