论文部分内容阅读
2010年5月30日,“两高”和三部委联合出台了《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》(以下简称《非法证据排除规定》)。该规定与时俱进,是我国刑事诉讼证据制度的伟大创新,象征着法制建设的文明与进步。它不仅强调了采用刑讯逼供等非法手段取得的言词证据不能作为定案的依据,还进一步对审查和排除非法证据的程序、证明责任以及讯问人员出庭等问题进行了具体的规范。笔者拟从反贪侦查实践出发,结合新出台的这一规定,围绕贿赂犯罪侦查中的口供问题进行探讨,以期抛砖引玉引发思想的交流和碰撞。
On May 30, 2010, the “two highs” and the three ministries and commissions jointly promulgated the “Provisions on Some Issues Concerning the Handling of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Cases” (hereinafter referred to as the “Exclusion of Illegal Evidence”). This rule advancing with the times is a great innovation in the evidence system of criminal procedure in our country and a symbol of civilization and progress in the legal system construction. It not only emphasizes that testimony obtained through illegal means of extorting a confession by torture can not be used as a basis for verdict, but also further regulates the procedures for the examination and exclusion of illegal evidence, the burden of proof and the appearance of interrogators. I intend to start from the anti-corruption investigation practice, combined with the new provisions of this bribery criminal investigation in the confession issue to explore, with a view to triggering ideas exchange and collision.