论文部分内容阅读
读刘可秋医师“2％紅汞溶液所致过敏性休克一例报告”(山东医刊5:9,1965)后,感触至深。在此,就该文中“过敏性休克”問題与作者进行商榷。一、该文只談到对汞剂发生过敏性休克,未提局部(伤口)对汞剂的反应状态,似乎只有剧烈的全身反应,而不能发生局部的过敏反应。二、笔者亦曾遇四例此种現象,伤口有深有浅,甚至是輕微的擦皮伤,涂紅汞溶液后旋即昏倒,推測并不是“因伤口較深,汞剂迅速进入血循环而致速发型反应”,何况严重的过敏反应与剂量大小无关。
Read Liu Keqiu “2% Mercury-induced allergic shock case report” (Shandong Medical Journal 5: 9, 1965), the feeling deep. In this article, the article “allergic shock” question with the author. First, this article only talked about the occurrence of anaphylactic shock on the amalgam, without mentioning the local (wound) state of response to the amalgam. It seems that there is only a violent systemic reaction and no local allergic reaction occurs. Second, the author also had four cases of this phenomenon, the wounds are shallow, or even a slight rub skin, immediately after the application of Mercury solution fainted, presumably not “due to deeper wounds, rapid mercury into the bloodstream caused Hairstyle reaction ”, not to mention a serious allergic reaction and dose size has nothing to do.