论文部分内容阅读
2010年高考语文全国卷1选了萧萧的一篇回忆性抒情散文《灯火》,给出的参考答案似是而非,有不少严重谬误,显示出题人并没有真正读懂这篇散文,因而在一些很浅显的问题上出现理解偏差。笔者现在提出自己的一点见解,与学术界的有识之士作一些深入的探讨,唯愿以后此类误人子弟的荒诞事故少出一点,这样对天下学子也算公平一些。先列出原文:
2010 national college entrance examination language volume 1 selected Xiao Xiao’s a lyric essay lyric “light”, given the reference plausible, there are a lot of serious fallacies, showing that the subject did not really read the essay, so in some Understandable bias appears on very salient issues. I now put forward my own opinions and make some in-depth discussions with people of insight in the academic field. I would only hope that such absurd accidents of human beings and children will be less and less so that fairness to the world’s students will be considered. First list the original: