最高人民法院于2008年12月废止了原于2001年7月24日就齐玉苓案作出的批复,在废止该批复时并未阐明废止的理由。笔者认为,最高人民法院废止某项包括批复在内的司法解释无非有三个理由:一是最高人民法院越权作出司法解释;二是该司法解释内容不妥当;三是该司法解释的内容与宪法或法律相抵触。 In December 2008, the Supreme People’s Court repealed the original reply on Qi Yuling dated July 24, 2001 and did not state the grounds for annulment upon annulment of the reply. The author believes that the Supreme Court of the People’s Republic of China abolished a judicial interpretation, including the approval of no more than three reasons: First, the supreme people’s court to make judicial interpretation of the ultra vires; Second, the content of the judicial interpretation is not appropriate; Third, the contents of the judicial interpretation and the Constitution or Laws conflict.