论文部分内容阅读
2004年宪法修正案使得我国征收补偿制度有了宪法上的依据,但是这一条文对征收的概念和征收补偿的标准并没有明确界定,并不能解决现实中存在的各种复杂问题。通过对美国和德国关于征收制度的宪法条文表现、征收的概念、征收制度的历史演进和征收补偿标准几方面的比较研究,可以看到我国当前的征收概念应严格限定,而征收补偿标准应实行“市价”后的从宽补偿。
The Constitutional Amendment of 2004 provided a constitutional basis for the system of expropriation in our country. However, this article does not clearly define the concept of expropriation and the standard of expropriation and compensation, and can not solve the complicated problems existing in reality. Through the comparison of the constitutional provisions in the United States and Germany, the concept of expropriation, the historical evolution of the expropriation system and the comparison of the standard of compensation for expropriation, we can see that the current concept of expropriation in China should be strictly limited, and the standard of expropriation and compensation should be implemented “Market price ” after the wide compensation.