开放式同行评议作为一种新的期刊审稿方式,因其控制投稿质量、加速学术交流、为有争议的科学发现存档等优点而吸引了许多学术期刊进行尝试。考察了几家有代表性的开放式同行评议期刊后发现,这些期刊中的大部分文章在评议阶段获得的评论,无论是数量还是质量都不尽如人意。认为造成这一现象的主要原因是功利主义、文化障碍和学科差异。 As a new way of reviewing journals, open peer review has attracted many academic journals for its efforts of controlling the quality of submission, accelerating academic exchanges and archiving controversial scientific findings. After examining a few representative peer-reviewed journals, I found that most of the articles in these journals did not get satisfactory comments in terms of quantity or quality during the review phase. The main reason for this phenomenon is utilitarianism, cultural barriers and disciplinary differences.