无论是什么报刊,总是力求以有限的版面,刊登最多的稿件,增大报刊的单位容量,向读者提供最丰富的信息.那么,显而易见,对已经决定采用的稿件进行一番删改,完成精加工的“头道工序”,就成为编辑工作中十分重要而又十分实际的问题.删改得好,可以使文章短小精粹,耐读耐看,以最小的篇幅,传达最丰富的信息.删改得不好,有可能使本来不错的作品,成为等外品,甚至是废品,即使勉强发表出来,不仅不会收到好的宣传效果,甚至会贻笑大方.这里确实有一个文野之分,粗细之分.一提“删”,有的人很容易认为,无非是对文稿大砍大杀,删得愈短愈好,愈简愈好.这种看法带有很大的片面性.删,是有原则的,并不是不问什么情况,不管内容与对象地胡 No matter what newspapers and magazines are always seeking to publish the largest number of manuscripts in a limited layout, increasing the newspaper’s unit capacity, to provide readers with the most abundant information.So, it is clear that the manuscript has been decided to adopt a number of amendments to complete the fine Processing the “first step process” has become a very important editorial work very practical issues.Changed well, you can make the article is short, read-tolerant, with the smallest space, to convey the richest information. Well, it is possible to make otherwise good works, such as foreign goods, or even scrap products, even if barely published, not only will not receive good publicity, or even laughable. There is indeed a field of distinction, the thickness of the points. Mentioning “deletion”, some people think it is easy to think that this is nothing more than a slash for the document and the shorter the deletion, the better and the more concise the better. This view has a great one-sidedness. , Do not ask what is the case, regardless of the content and target Hu