论文部分内容阅读
理论上,法官声誉与法院公信力之间具有正相关性。但是,由于中国最高法院大法官的声誉并不是通过审判活动来对法律和司法制度做出贡献,因而很难通过大法官声誉来提高最高法院公信力。事实上,与美国以及同属大陆法系的德国、日本、台湾地区相比,中国大陆目前还没有建立起有效制度来激励大法官乃至所有法官关注个体职业声誉,也没有建立起测评法官公信度的机制。因此,现有一些改革措施的实际效果是有限的。
In theory, there is a positive correlation between a judge's reputation and the credibility of the court. However, it is difficult to elevate the supreme court's credibility through the reputation of a judge because the Chinese Supreme Court judge's reputation does not contribute to the law and the judiciary through trial activities. In fact, compared with the United States and the civil law countries of Germany, Japan and Taiwan, mainland China has not yet established an effective system to motivate judges and even all judges to pay attention to individual professional reputation, nor establish the credibility of judges mechanism. Therefore, the actual effectiveness of some existing reform measures is limited.