论文部分内容阅读
长期以来,我国设计专业的招生考试都在照搬美术专业的统考模式,这种统考模式统一命题要求、统一评分标准,带有浓重的标准化、单一化色彩,它虽有许多便利特征,但在根本上有悖于设计学科的特征。因此,统考模式不利于创新型设计人才的培养。一、统考模式中负面影响最大的考核科目是素描。统考模式的素描考试要求一贯注重考察考生对色调光影、形体结构与空间透视的掌握程度。这种模式容易养成学生观察事物的“单向”性与惰性。从设计创新的角度来理解,这类素描考试反映出来的只是考生造型技能技巧的熟练程度,实际与设计思维、创新表达所必备的基本素质相去甚远。因此,这种“八股”式的统考素描模式不具备设计学科考核考生专业能力的准确性、全面性与科学性。
For a long time, all the entrance examinations of design major in our country are copying the examination mode of art major. This mode requires a unified proposition, uniform scoring standard, strong standardization and simpler colorization. Although it has many convenient features, On the contrary to the characteristics of design disciplines. Therefore, the exam model is not conducive to the cultivation of innovative design talents. First, the most negative negative impact test model examination subjects are sketches. The exam mode requirements of the sketch test has always focused on examining the examinee’s mastery of hue, shape and spatial perspective. This model is easy to develop students to observe things “one-way” and inertia. From the perspective of design innovation, this kind of sketch test only reflects the proficiency of the examinee’s modeling skill, which is far from the basic quality necessary for the design thinking and innovative expression. Therefore, this kind of “eight-legged” type of examination drawing model does not have the accuracy, comprehensiveness and scientific nature of the professional competence of candidates for the design discipline examination.