论文部分内容阅读
我国民事立法在医疗侵权证明责任分配制度设计上经历了数次“范式”革新,每一次“范式”的革新都是在既有医疗纠纷矛盾强烈地推动下“倒逼”前进。然而,这种数次革新并未从根本上解决医患关系的紧张局面,反而“辱医”、“袭医”、“杀医”的事件愈演愈烈。究其原因,更多的可归咎于立法过程中对于相关事项的准备不足,缺乏对制度本身深刻的认识。为了完善我国现有医疗侵权证明责任分配制度,本文认为有必要去重新审视证明责任分配制度意义,努力地去探求现有制度设计中所存在的缺陷,并提出相应对策来克服该制度设计上的缺陷,从而对医疗侵权案件中患者和医疗机构之间利益予以妥善安排。
China’s civil legislation has undergone several “paradigm” innovations in the design of the liability distribution system for the certification of medical tort. Every “paradigm” innovation is driven by the contradiction between existing medical disputes. go ahead. However, this kind of reform has not fundamentally solved the tension between doctor-patient relations, but has intensified the attacks on doctors, doctors, doctors and doctors. The reason, more can be attributed to the lack of preparation for the relevant issues in the legislative process, the lack of a profound understanding of the system itself. In order to perfect the distribution system of the burden of proof for medical infringement in our country, this paper thinks it is necessary to re-examine the significance of the system of distribution of burden of proof, and strive to explore the existing defects in the existing system design and put forward corresponding countermeasures to overcome the system design Defects, and thus the medical interests of patients and medical institutions in medical tort cases to be properly arranged.