最近,《中国价格监督检查》曾刊登了一篇《“下查一级”应当慎行》的文章,笔者对此文中的观点很有同感。 首先,我们应该肯定,最初采用下查一级的工作方法确实取得了很好的经济效益和社会效益。但近些年来对公安、工商、公路、交通、土地、城建、电信、供电、民政、农机等大系统的检查,基本上都采用“下查一级”的方法,这使得上级部门顾此失彼,检查流于形式;再者由于地域原因,使上级检查人员在执法过程中无法保证自由裁量尺度的确定性,反而增加了自由度。这都严重影响着下查一级的执法力度和价格执法的权 Recently, the “China Price Surveillance Inspection” has published an article entitled “Check the next level should be cautious,” the article, I agree with the views in this article. First of all, we should be sure that the working methods originally adopted for the next round of inspection have indeed achieved very good economic and social benefits. However, in recent years, inspections of large-scale systems such as public security, industry and commerce, highways, transport, land, urban construction, telecommunications, power supply, civil administration and agricultural machinery have basically adopted the method of “examining one level below”, which makes superior departments take precautions against each other and check In the meantime, due to geographical reasons, higher-level inspectors can not guarantee the certainty of the discretionary scale in the process of law enforcement, but instead increase the degree of freedom. This has seriously affected the next level of law enforcement efforts and the price of law enforcement