论文部分内容阅读
中国画人才培养被纳入现代教育体系已有近百年的历史。对于20世纪以来的中国画人才培养以及中国画的发展,这些年来有不同的评价,有学者认为百年来中国画坛涌现的大师在数量上、品质上难以与古代相提并论,以至现代以来中国画进入了一个低谷期。对于这样的认识与评价,我倒不一定认同。在我看来,在中国绘画史的评价上向来都存在着厚古薄今、近不如古的思维模式,总认为正在发生的总不如已过去的,近代的总不如隔代的。要对现代以来的中国画方位价值做客观准确的评价,还需要一个历史的“沉淀期”。也就是说,对现在进行时中的中国画人才培养与
Chinese painting personnel training has been incorporated into the modern education system for nearly a hundred years of history. For the training of Chinese painting since the 20th century and the development of Chinese painting, there have been different evaluations in recent years. Some scholars think that in the past 100 years, the masters who emerged in the field of Chinese painting came to terms with quantity and quality, making it difficult to compare with ancient times. As a result, modern Chinese painting entered a trough period. . I do not necessarily agree with such understanding and evaluation. In my opinion, the evaluation of the history of Chinese painting has always existed with the ancient and modern times, the ancient pattern of thinking, always think that what is happening is not as good as the past, the modern always inferior to every generation. To evaluate objectively and accurately the bearing value of Chinese painting since the modern era, we still need a historic “precipitation period.” In other words, it is necessary to cultivate and cultivate the talents of Chinese painting nowadays