论文部分内容阅读
截至发稿时,记者一直还在四方求证“两税合并草案”到底会不会提交10月份的全国人大常委会进行初审。因为有了太多的“前车之鉴”,打听的结果终究还是显得有些差强人意,让人无法踏实。“目前来看,对于合并的本身和趋势,反对意见已经不是很强烈了。矛盾主要已经集中在改革后的税率和税收优惠政策等问题上,暂时还没有形成最终的统一意见。9月份有关部门已经将各方面的意见进行了讨论并作出综合,并把草案上报了决策部门,10月进入人大常委会初审应该还是有希望的。”权威人士,一直致力于推动“两税合并”改革并参与该政策制定的国务院国情研究中心、中国法学会财税法学研究会顾问刘先生近日向记者如此透露。
As of press time, the reporter has been still in the Quartet to verify whether the draft “two tax merger” will be submitted to the NPC Standing Committee in October for the first instance. Because there are too many “lessons”, inquire about the results after all, it seems a little unsatisfactory, people can not be practical. “At present, the objections to the merger itself and the trend have not been very strong. The contradictions have mainly been focused on issues such as the reform of the tax rate and tax preferential policies, and yet the final unanimous opinion has not been formed yet.” In September, relevant departments All opinions have been discussed and consolidated, and the draft has been reported to the decision-making departments, and the preliminary review of the NPC Standing Committee in October should still be promising. “The authorities have been devoting themselves to promoting the reform of the” two tax mergers "and their participation The policy formulation of the State Council National Research Center, China Law Society fiscal tax law consultants Liu told reporters so recently.