拜读了方孔先生的著作《实在法原理》之后,笔者对其中的部分观点不敢苟同。笔者认为,自然法并非是实在法存在的根基,没有自然法,实在法依然切实有效。同时,方孔先生的自然法理论本身就存在一个悖论,因为自然法其内容本身就无法确定,所以自然法根本不可能作为判定实在法效力的标准。 After reading Mr. Fang Kong’s book “Principles of Real Law,” I disagreed with some of these views. The author believes that natural law is not the foundation of the existence of real law, there is no natural law, the real law is still effective. At the same time, there is a paradox in Fang Fang’s theory of natural law itself. Because the content of natural law can not be determined by itself, natural law simply can not be used as a criterion for determining the validity of the real law.