谁是平衡发展最好的政府——对全国336个地区的绩效评估

来源 :当代中国政治研究报告 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:txl8909
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
平衡发展能力是今天中国行政能力建设的重要内容,除了传统的以消除城乡差异、区域差异作为主要政策目标外,中国还致力于实现绿色发展,平衡经济增长与环境保护的关系被纳入发展的议题之中。本文将环境保护、城乡差距以及区域差距作为衡量平衡发展水平的三个代理变量,通过收集全国317个地市级行政区、4个直辖市及15个副省级城市的数据,在科学的指标构建和数据分析基础上,对336个地区平衡发展的分领域绩效和综合绩效进行了排序、比较,并试图探析其规律性特征。 In addition to the traditional policy of eliminating urban-rural differences and regional differences as the main policy goal, China is also committed to achieving green development and balancing the relationship between economic growth and environmental protection has been included in the development agenda Among them. This paper takes environmental protection, urban-rural disparity and regional disparity as the three proxy variables to measure the level of balanced development. By collecting the data of 317 prefectural-level administrative regions, 4 municipalities and 15 sub-provincial cities in China, Based on the data analysis, we sorted and compared the sub-field performance and comprehensive performance of the balanced development in 336 regions, and tried to analyze its regularity characteristics.
其他文献
用可及性和内容来测量的电子准备度指标通常用于电子政府网站评估。我们提供的实验性证据来自四个电子准备度指标(包括可及性、电子信息、电子请愿和电子参与)及韩国中央政府