论文部分内容阅读
二语形态问题是二语习得研究的一个中心课题,也是近年来生成语法学派研究的一个热点。以往生成语法学派采用语言习得的“逻辑问题”的框架来探讨二语习得问题,但近年来越来越多的研究表明这样的框架并不适合于二语形态问题。最简方案的提出为二语形态问题研究带来新的转机。本文首先介绍了最简方案对语言机能的设计、语言间差异的限定和语言习得任务的定位,并指出这样的理论框架特别适合于二语形态问题。随后本文重点论述词汇主义和分离假说对可学性问题的不同理解以及由此产生的对二语形态问题的两种不同研究取向。在详细分析和比较以上两种不同的观点和研究取向的的基础上,本文对二语形态问题的研究现状进行评论,并展望了今后的研究方向。
The second language morphology is a central topic in the study of second language acquisition and also a hot spot in the study of grammatical schools in recent years. In the past, the grammatical schools of grammar used the framework of language acquisition “logic problems ” to explore the problem of second language acquisition. However, more and more studies in recent years show that such a framework is not suitable for L2 patterns. The proposal of the Minimalist Program brings a new turning point to the study of L2 morphology. This paper firstly introduces the design of language function, the definition of the differences between languages and the orientation of language acquisition tasks in Minimalist Program. It also points out that such a theoretical framework is particularly suitable for L2 language formation. After that, the dissertation focuses on the different understandings of lexicalism and seperation hypothesis on malleable problems and the two different research orientations on L2 formations. On the basis of detailed analysis and comparison of the above two different viewpoints and research orientation, this article reviews the research status of the second language morphology and prospects the future research direction.