在专利确权程序中,当权利要求技术特徵的文义包含多种含义可能需要将其解释为说明书的具体实施方式时,应当考察该多种含义之间的相同点和差异点,若差异点都属于本领域常规技术手段,或者若针对从相同点到说明书具体实施方式的技术改进过程中,说明书未公开任何具有创造性的内容,则不宜将权利要求解释为说明书的具体实施方式。 In the process of patent entitlement determination, when the meaning of the technical features of the claims contains multiple meanings which may need to be interpreted as the specific implementation manners of the specification, the same points and different points of the multiple meanings should be examined. If the difference All belong to the common technical field in the art, or if the specification does not disclose any creative content in the technical improvement from the same point to the specific implementation manners of the specification, the claims should not be construed as the specific implementation manners of the specification.