论文部分内容阅读
庄子和维特根斯坦二者作为东西方有影响力的哲学家,但他们却有很多共同的地方,共同之处在于庄子和维特根斯坦都发现了语言的困境。他们发现了存在着语言无法表达的领域。这就是我们经常说的不可说之域。不可说的东西,二者的不同也非常明显:维特根斯坦对于不可言说的领域所采取的方法是:沉默;而庄子却一方面保持沉默,一方面却又再言说。笔者认为庄子应用的是意象语言,而维特根斯坦应用的是科学语言,也就是哲学语言。
Both Zhuangzi and Wittgenstein, both influential philosophers of the East and the West, have much in common with each other and Chuang Tzu and Wittgenstein both found the language predicament. They found that there are areas that the language can not express. This is what we often say can not say. What can not be said, the differences between the two are also obvious: Wittgenstein’s approach to the unspeakable field is silence; while Chuang Tzu remains silent on the one hand and yet again. The author thinks Zhuangzi applies image language, and Wittgenstein applies scientific language, that is, philosophical language.