论文部分内容阅读
一、问题之提出刘男、刘女原系夫妻,双方于2005年9月13日在民政局协议离婚,离婚协议书中载明了刘男在婚姻关系存续期间与第三者同居的事实。2005年9月26日,刘男为刘女出具一欠条,内容为:“今欠刘女5万元整,订于2006年12月份还清。欠款人:刘男”。后刘男未依据欠条履行,刘女遂持欠条起诉至法院,要求刘男依欠条给付5万元欠款。而刘男则称自己不欠刘女钱,当时是因刘女扣押户口本,其为迁移户口不得已才写的欠条。
First, the issue raised Liu, Liu Female was originally a couple, the two sides on September 13, 2005 at the Civil Affairs Bureau agreement divorce, divorce agreement contains the fact that Liu men living together with a third party during the marriage relationship. On September 26, 2005, Liu Nan issued an IOU for Liu Hsiu and said: “I am owed $ 50,000 to my bachelor and will be due for payment in December 2006. Arrears: Liu Nan”. After Liu Nan was not based on the implementation of IOU, Liu Sui Sui owe IOU prosecution to the court, asked Liu Nan to pay 50000 yuan arrears arrears. While Liu Nan claimed that he did not owe the money Liu, Liu was arrested because of this account, which is the last resort to write IOUs.