论文部分内容阅读
作者借自己的专著《选题论》再版的契机,阐述了对编辑出版学研究的一些看法和体会。文章指出,长期以来,编辑出版学在形成一门学问的过程中权威性和普适性受到质疑。这是源于编辑出版学研究的难点:其一,编辑出版活动涉及人类和自然的一切活动和变化;其二,编辑出版活动在本质上要求必须不重复,必须现出新的东西。文章还提出,编辑出版活动具有以下特点:其一,编辑出版活动必须依托某一学科才能发挥功力;其二,编辑出版活动中的变量因素要远远大于稳定因素;其三,跃动着的变量因素在编辑出版这一动态过程中往往起着决定性作用;其四,每一次编辑出版活动,都只可能是相近、相似而不是相同的。因此,编辑出版学的研究应该关注编辑出版活动中的动态因素,探究如何控制它们在编辑出版活动中的变化。这一研究角度的转变,也涉及思维方法的转变。
The author borrows the opportunity of the reprint of his monograph “Selected Topics” to expound some opinions and understandings on the research of editorial and publishing. The article points out that, for a long time, editorial and publishing studies in the process of forming a knowledge of the authoritative and universally questioned. This is due to the difficulties of editing and publishing research: First, the editing and publishing activities involve all the activities and changes of mankind and nature; secondly, the editing and publishing activities essentially require that they must not be repeated and new things must be invented. The article also pointed out that the editing and publishing activities have the following characteristics: First, editing and publishing activities must rely on a subject to play a skill; Second, editing and publishing activities in the variable factor is far greater than the stability factor; Third, The variable factor often plays a decisive role in the dynamic process of editing and publishing. Fourthly, every editing and publishing activity may only be similar, similar but not identical. Therefore, the study of editorial and publishing should pay attention to the dynamic factors in editing and publishing activities, and explore how to control their changes in editing and publishing activities. This shift from the research perspective also involves the shift in the way of thinking.